Dating in Your 30sTake the quiz

What you want

Relationship check-in questions that don't feel clinical

A regular check-in sounds like homework until you've had one that went well. Here's what a relationship counseling service suggests asking, what a trial of yearly relationship checkups found, and how to keep the conversation from turning into a performance review.

Over coffee on a small balcony, a bearded man in a forest-green sweater talks while a woman in an oatmeal cardigan listens with her knees drawn up.
Illustration. AI-generated image.
Jump to a section
  1. Questions worth borrowing
  2. Is there evidence check-ins do anything?
  3. What to actually talk about
  4. Keeping it from turning into a review
  5. Gaps in what’s known

Most couples talk constantly and still go months without talking about the relationship itself. Then something small, like who’s doing dinner, turns into a fight about everything. A planned check-in is meant to catch things before they get that big.

It doesn’t need to be formal, but it does need to be regular enough that it isn’t a sign of trouble.

Questions worth borrowing

Relationships Australia Queensland, a counseling service, publishes a list of check-in questions. A few of them, lightly paraphrased:4

  • What do you love most about us right now?
  • What would you change?
  • What would you like more of from me? And less of?
  • Is anything bothering you that we haven’t talked about yet?
  • How do you feel about the way we talk to each other?

Their framing is the useful part: these aren’t the opening of a breakup conversation, they’re maintenance. Asking “what would you like more of from me” also avoids the defensive version, “what am I doing wrong?”4

You don’t need all of them. Two or three, the same ones each time, makes the habit easier to keep.

Is there evidence check-ins do anything?

The closest test is the Marriage Checkup. In a 2014 trial, 215 married couples were randomly assigned either to two relationship checkups a year apart or to a wait-list. Each checkup was a structured assessment visit followed by a feedback visit. Over two years, the checkup couples reported more intimacy and more feeling accepted by their partner, and less relationship distress, than the wait-list couples.1

Two caveats. The checkups were structured visits inside a research trial, not a chat over coffee. And the participants were married, mostly white and in their 40s on average, so it’s a reasonable signal for couples in their 30s rather than proof.

What to actually talk about

Researchers who study “relationship maintenance” have been sorting everyday behaviors into categories since at least 1991, when a study of dating, engaged and married couples identified five: positivity, assurances (signals of commitment), openness, sharing tasks and shared social networks.3 A 2013 review of 35 studies with more than 12,000 participants found all five went along with more satisfaction, commitment and love.2 That review is correlational, so it can’t show that doing more of these causes a better relationship. It does give you a decent agenda: how are we doing on warmth, on reassurance, on talking honestly, on splitting the load, on time with each other’s people?

If the “sharing the load” part is where things always land, fighting about chores gets into that one specifically.

Keeping it from turning into a review

Start with something you appreciate, and mean it. Ask, then listen to the whole answer before you explain. If one topic gets heated, park it and agree on a time to come back to it. And keep it short. A check-in that regularly runs two hours is a sign it’s carrying more than it should, and everything my partner does annoys me might be the more useful read.

Gaps in what’s known

  • The only randomized evidence here involved married couples and structured research visits, not do-it-yourself check-ins.
  • The maintenance research is mostly self-report and correlational.
  • None of these sources tests how often a couple should check in. The monthly rhythm in the script below is a suggestion, not a finding.

Try it

Is a check-in likely to go well this week? Tick what's true.

Is a check-in likely to go well this week? Tick what's true.

0 to 2 ticked

Maybe not this week

That's fine. Pick a calmer day, or start with just the first question and leave it there.

3 to 4 ticked

Good enough to try

Keep it short and start with what's working. You can add the harder questions next time.

5 to 6 ticked

Set up well

Go in curious rather than with a list of grievances, and keep the time limit even if it's going great.

Steal this text

Say it in your own words, or start from these

  • Suggesting the first one

    Random idea: what if once a month we did a 20-minute check-in? What's working, what we'd want more of. Low stakes.

  • Opening the conversation

    Before anything else, the thing I've liked most this month was that Saturday with nowhere to be.

People who talk about this

Labeled by where their authority comes from. Not a ranking, not an endorsement.

  • Credentialed source

Alexandra H. Solomon

Relational self awareness, dating and building lasting relationships, drawn from her couples work and her Northwestern course.

Licensed clinical psychologist; adjunct professor, School of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source

Eli J. Finkel

Research on how modern marriage and long term relationships work, and what partners expect from each other.

Professor of Psychology and of Management and Organizations, Northwestern University; director of the Relationships and Motivation Lab · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source
  • Trending voice

Julie Menanno

How couples get stuck in conflict cycles and how to feel secure with a partner.

Licensed marriage and family therapist (MA, LMFT, LCPC); author of Secure Love · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source

Justin J. Lehmiller

Research on sex, desire, casual relationships and friends with benefits.

Social psychologist (PhD, Purdue); Senior Research Fellow, The Kinsey Institute, Indiana University · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

All 12 people we point to →

Further reading

From other publishers we trust. The full list

Sources

  1. The Marriage Checkup: A randomized controlled trial of annual relationship health checkupsJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (Cordova and colleagues), 2014Used for: 215 married couples were randomly assigned to relationship checkups (assessment and feedback visits at the start and one year later) or a wait-list; checkup couples showed more intimacy and felt acceptance, and less relationship distress, at follow-ups over two years. Sample was 93.1% white, mean ages 44.5 and 47.
  2. A meta-analytic review of relationship maintenance and its correlatesJournal of Social and Personal Relationships (Ogolsky and Bowers), 2013Used for: Across 35 studies and 12,273 participants, positivity, openness, assurances, social networks and sharing tasks were positively correlated with satisfaction, commitment, love and liking.
  3. Maintenance Strategies and Romantic Relationship Type, Gender and Relational CharacteristicsJournal of Social and Personal Relationships (Stafford and Canary), 1991Used for: Identified five maintenance strategies (positivity, assurances, openness, sharing tasks, social networks) across dating, engaged and married couples; positivity, assurances and sharing tasks were consistent predictors of commitment, liking and satisfaction.
  4. 10 relationship check-in questionsRelationships Australia Queensland, 2024-06-10Used for: Suggests regular check-ins and a list of questions including what you love most about the relationship, what you'd change, what you'd like more and less of from each other, anything bothering you that hasn't been discussed, and how you feel about your communication.
Up nextShould couples combine finances? What a study tested